classes | logical, disjunct | |
types | ideal types at the center of fuzzy categories (e.g. prototype theory) | |
family resemblance | overlapping similarities |
Consider, for example, the activities that we call "games". I mean board-games, card-games, ball-games, athletic games, and so on. What is common to them all? – Don't say: "They must have something in common, or they would not be called 'games'" – but look and see whether there is anything common to all. – For it you look at them, you won't see something that is common to all, but similarities, affinities, and a whole series of them at that. [...]
And the upshot of these considerations is: we see a complicated network of similarities overlapping and criss-crossing [...]
I can think of no better expression to characterize these similarities than "family resemblances"; for the various resemblances between members of a family – build, features, colour of eyes, gait, temperament, and so on and so forth – overlap and criss-cross in the same way. – And I shall say: 'games' form a family.
Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, § 66-67.
In the German-speaking countries, Hans Robert Jauß was one of the first to explicitly reject the unquestioned identification of genres with classes in the logical sense of the word. Instead, he proposed the terminology of [...] 'groups or historical families' [(1972)...]. Shortly before, the term 'family' had also been used by Pichois and Rousseau (1967), justifying the analogy with the argument that 'genres', understood as 'historical concepts' in the same sense as proposed by [...] Jauß, represented a "série infinie d'œuvres particulières, ni absolumment identiques ni totalement différentes" [...]
When examining the texts labelled elegy in various European national literatures from antiquity up to the twentieth century, they, like Wittgenstein's games, reveal no other commonality but their name, elegy [...]
The diachrony of the genre can be represented as a synchronic network of relations, in which each individual text or epochal version of the genre is linked to other historical versions through common features. [...] The genre identiy, then, is not produced by a single trait but by the entirety of all relations among their historical versions.
Hempfer, Some Aspects of a Theory of Genre, 2014: 407, 417, 419.
|
Decision on parameters
for
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Slides at: https://hennyu.github.io/dsrom_19/
CLiGS: http://cligs.hypotheses.de/